www.owohrod.com.

Oh how I despise former President Barak Obama for what he has done.   Especially now that, in order to place Iran and its government back in the 'enemy box', I, the Great President Donald J Trump, must play the role of being 'the bad guy.'  It does not matter that I, we Americans, should not be surprised that Barak has sold us short, considering that he is not really 'a true American.'  Not having been born on the mainland. Not being white. Having an 'unAmerican' name. And looking more like the Iranians than he looks like 'a true American.' Yes, I know that I must be strong for our America, or, at least, I must pretend to be tough, even though, I, Donald J Trump is hurting greatly inside.  How can I not be seen to be tough, even tougher that the career and battle hardened military men who are purportedly my key advisers?  I mean, look at President Putin. Look how tough he is and how he makes it appear natural?  It was meant to

America's national or domestic policies and values, like her international and foreign policies, are probably mainly predicated upon racial division and racism.  In America, it targets Americans of colour, and abroad, it targets and treat people of colour less favourably.  Which is what it is doing to the Iranians, who are neither white Europeans nor Christians, nor, in the main, Jews.  If we were to perceive the world as a slave plantation, then, might we not consider the government of Israel as being the in situ 'overseer' for the Middle East region of the absent 'American plantation owner.'  It is worth a thought, as, sometimes, what we imagine to be fiction, is actually more representative of what is happening.   Than the transmitted perceptions which we are being fed, by those who have an interest in us consuming them. And now, we shall have to wait to see if the American Congress is to going to disrespect the American Flag and Anthem, like i

Therapist.: So, Usa. Until then, what are you going to do about all the innocent people you keep on killing, Usa?  Are you going to be satisfied with your wailing, rationalisations and prayers at each outrage?  Are you not concerned that, after awhile, others will get fedup with you ignoring the need to do anything effective about your persistent self-harming?  That they will stop hearing you and offering you any sympathy after each outrage. Usa.: Well, yes, they might, but that could also be a good thing, because it would remove some of the external pressure on me to do anything effective. Therapist.: Are you saying that you are only giving the appearance of taking it serious, Usa, when, in fact, you really do not give  a damn, and expect Americans to 'get over it'? Usa.: Well, kind of. I mean, it is nothing new, man. As I told you, we have been shooting each other to death for at least a couple of hundreds of years now.  And there are still over

I listened one Somaliland young man, rightly commenting on his opposition to this barbarity, and how he would marry an 'uncut' woman.  But, there was also this other young man who reflected the 'living dead FGM culture.'  For him, yes, probably because of the presence of the camera, it was right that women should have a view about whether to have the brutality of 'The Cut' perpetrated on their bodies and psyche.   But, he inferred, such a view should not be allowed to take precedence over the assumed primacy of their culture. By which he meat, 'the cutting' should continue, because 'it is our culture.' I have to admit that, the enormity of this crime against humanity. I did wonder whether aid to Somiland, should not be made subjected to their government outlawing this crime, and taking effective action to enforce the law banning it. Just a thought. And then the programme moved to Kenya, where we were given an account of how, with s

Yes, what should we make of Trump's attempt to try to justify his decision to decertify the Iran Nuclear Agreement, on which America's signature is stamped?  How should the world view and respond to a President who, having declared his opposition to the INA, then dishonestly and perfidiously look for 'the evidence', for the 'imaginary smoking gun.'  To 'prove' his ridiculous assertion that an agreement which progresses, promotes the cause of mutual cooperation and peace in the Middle East, 'is the worst deal in history?  To 'prove' that the reduction of tensions and conflicts in the world, is not better and more desirable that stoking the embers of such tensions and conflicts, in the dishonest and foolish pursuit of the unobtainably 'total peace'?   Total or complete peace, which, in the language of 'America's foreign policy dogma', really means 'the submission of all our enemies, real and designated, to

Yes, it is the case that, providing they have or able to get the sponsorship, possibly anybody can become the President of the United States of America.  Now, is that a good or virtuous thing, or is likely to be a bad and dangerous thing?  Do you want a 'moron' or a mad and deluded person to be leader or managing you, much more so your country?  And, especially is your country happens to be the formerly great and soon to be great again United States of America? Probably not, but, if that is a nightmare scenario, then it is one which has now become the reality for the people of the United States of America, and, yes, for the rest of the world.   Since America has presumed itself to be the questionable leader of the free world.  And, since America sees it as its continuing vocation to be at war. Leading and cojoling 'the forces of good' of  the 'free world' against the 'forces of evil' of the 'unfree world.'   It means that the w