www.owohrod.com.

  Big, Big Congratulations to Lewis Hamilton and Team Mercedes for sculpting, engineering a Win at the Russian Grand Prix at the Sochi Circuit on Sunday 27th September 2021. A Big Congratulations, also, to Max Verstappen and Team Red Bull, and to Carlos Sainz and Team Ferrari for making it P.2 and P.3, respectively.  And Massive Commiserations to Lando Norris and Team McLaren, for not having made it to P.1 or P.2.  Primarily, it seems, because they hag gotten their communications and strategy terribly wrong, in their response to the rain downpour during the last few laps of the race.  Which resulted in Norris being caught out with the wrong tyres to maintain his race lead.   And creating the fortuitous opportunity for Lewis to take the lead, and Max to promote himself to P.2.As Norris drifted backwards and finally held on at P.7.  A situation which was not massively different to how Hamilton's late tyre change, coupled with his accident while pitting, deprived him of a probable Pol

  I mean, think of it, contemplate on the idea, theory or hypothesis that, the dead, who no longer or otherwise navigate the earth.  Except for those of us who believe that there is a soul or spirit entity which leaves our bodies when we die, and maintains a conscious existence of their dead bodies.   Will miraculously be risen up by 'God' on the 'Day of Judgement', and be rewarded by being ascended to 'Heaven', or punished, by being sent to 'Hell' or 'Hades.'  Does that sound like rational or logical thinking? That all the billions of people, many of who were infants when they died, will be again become alive? While it might mak e a bit of sense, if theistic religions were to argue that, the 'God' that they serve or worship.  Would be raising the 'faithful', the 'believer' from their state of death, and reward them by sending or taking them to 'Heaven.'  It is more difficult to argue the supposed logic of raising

  There are many adjectives which people could and would use to preface their description of any human who would seek to put forward an argument for our species not continuing to have children.  Idiot, fool, miscreant, insane, are but a few of them. Ok, granted that some of those reactions , would be initial and/or knee-jerk ones, which might or might not be subsequently tempered after the responders engage their intellects.  Granted, also, that 'calmer heads' might prevail after those on whose ears such a shocking and apparently foolish and suicidal proposition were to fall.   When they seek further information about which any human would argue for such finalistic solution to whatever 'problem' human existence poses and confronts. I can appreciate that any argument or case for not having children, must also be an argument and case for the extinction of the human species.  Yes, I can and would not seek to argue otherwise. Yes, the case for not having children is the ver