www.owohrod.com.

  So, of course the 'religious moralists' and the 'guardians of the prophets, the scribes, the disciples, et al' will declare this to be sacrilegious, blasphemous, and so son.  And yet, is it not right and proper, is it not prudent that the question should be posed?  The question being this : Should us humans not deify, make unto us A God of Google. Google the Search Engine and Apparent Receptacle  of most, if not all Accumulated  Knowledge? Experientially, there is a great deal of evidence for arguing that, Google The Search Engine and Possessor of seemingly all Knowledge, is worthy of being made into, and, if needs be, worshipped as a God, if not the God of us humans?  Yes, it is the case that Google will not actually do things per say for us, when we turn to 'It' in times of our need.  With the required level and kind of infrastructure, we have to leave the doing to the robotics army. However, to a significant extent, Google will, more often than not, guide u

     Or 'I will not allow you to live without me', in reference to the other partner.  Thus one of the embittered partner begins to plot how he/she, but more often, he, is going to destroy the other partner, and, sometimes, their children.  The latter being a sickness and callousness which we do not find in, say, the relationship between lions.  Because, although a lion destroys the cubs of the mother's previous suitor, pursuance of getting the lioness to have its own cubs, it probably will only rarely kills its own cubs.  In this regard, whereas the lion kills to induce the lioness to have its own offspring. The hurt and enraged man will sometimes kills his own child/ren to as an act of 'punishing' their mother for leaving him. And then, there is 'the war thing about some or most men.' Why are men so apparently prone to cause conflict?  Us men, it appears, are inherently and genetically pre-set to cause and initiate violent conflict. It is in our genes, in

  And while all of this is slowing being done, and the dead are being registered on the basis of 'first died, first registered', so must my dear mother do her bit and remain in the queue of the dead.  Just as well that the dead, as far as us the living are able to ascertain, are no longer able to be cognisant of their or their bodies' predicament.  That they are no longer able to perceive that their temporary, though for us, the living, seemingly overdue tenancy in a mortuary, as they await, as it were, their final or near permanent place of rest.  Oh that my dear mother, like others in her position, should have to contend, or not, with what seems to me, an indignity.  One which I can only but hope, will not be too drawn out, as the queue in front of her diminishes, and gives way to her turn.    Today is the second week since my son and I have had the experience of witnessing the passing of my dear mother, and his dear grandmother's passing.  And yes, as I write this po