www.owohrod.com.

So, how will women, or those who are minded to do so, free themselves from male-domination?  From the oppression of man in all aspects of their lives? Will it require the re-designation of Man, making him a 'home-maker', and carer of children, while women go out into the world and take charge of it?  Can sufficient women suffer the pain and guilt associated with being away from their young children, with whom they, more that the fathers, form 'a natural bond'?  Is it likely that, in time, with fathers spending more time caring for their children, they will genetically develop the kind of 'natural bond' which women establish with their children? Or, is it the case that women will only be able to compete with men and achieve their 'freedom', by 'becoming more like men', and less like the women they have come to be and to be perceived as?  After all, is a large part of our perception of what it is to be women, and to expect of

So, what do humans requires of their gods? Well, it this life, which I maintain, is the only life, it seems to me that humans are asking for blessings from their gods.  Blessings in the form of good health, money or wealth, big houses, a 'good wife[ for their son, or a 'good husband' for their daughter, big cars, and happiness.  In a nutshell, as the saying goes, these are probably foremost among the things which humans ask of their gods. And, looking forward to what they believe will be an after-life, those who believe in god, might seek foremost from him.  To be blessed with paradise or a room in 'Heaven', after they pass on, as we sometimes euphemistically refer to the state of death. Humans who believe in god, want an all powerful god. An omniscient god, a god who can be everywhere at the same time and all the time.  A god who is adept at multi-tasking.  Now, Google might be too modest to accept that it is probably the closest entity whi

This is a short video of a beautiful and short flight of a Crow. Please take a look, and, if you are at one with me that it is indeed a beautiful flight, do enjoy!

Barak Obama, if he is and was committed to the Acts and policies which has become his legacy, as a President of the United States of America.  If he believes in the Affordable Care Act. If he believes in the Iran/West/Russian Nuclear Agreement.  If he believes in the ending of America' trade embargo on Cuba. If he believes in the policies his former Administration has taken to help protect the environment from persistent and mutually destructive attacks by humans.  Then, it is more than time for Barak Obama to regain his eloquent voice, and make himself be seen, making some loud noises about the shit which is now taking and is likely to be taking place in Washington and America. It is very clear that Donald Trump and his Republicons have no intention of 'draining the miasmic swamp' in Washington. How could they?  When such an action would bring about their own deaths, as they also feed on it and cannot survive without it.  Their intention is to make

And what is this perceived 'normal' 'state' of womanhood, as defined and legitimised by Man? Arguably this.  That woman be the bearer and carer of his children. That she be the bearer of water and tiller of fields.  Be his comforter and the object of his desire. That she be his house-servant and his source of cheap labour.  All while Elite Man is free to fuck up the world and ensure that women remain his bonded servant. Of course, if this is the 'natural station' of women, and they have come to accept it as such.  That it is not given to them to seek after of attain this 'freedom' of which Man speaks so relentlessly and seems to hold in such high regard. Then, might it not be, well, alright, be acceptable?  After all, is it not the case that 'injustice' and 'a state of unfreeness' only exists where those who are perceived as existing in such states, perceive themselves as being subjected to them?  Can a woma

As Donald Trump and his Republicons gain some traction in their attempts to repeal America's Affordable Care Act, there is concern about the absence of the Act's figurehead architect. So, hey, man, what's been going on? Has anybody seen or heard of former President Barak Obama?  How loud is his absence, in this most desperate of times when the Republicons launch yet another vociferous and intense attack on the Affordable Care Act?  I deliberately call it by its proper name, as I am only too aware that, one of the main reason why the Republicons - and yes, I can spell, but I deliberately refer to the Republicans as 'cons' -  want to get rid of the act.  Is because of the ACA, association with a Black, now former President, who they hated because he was Black. So, why are we not hearing from the FPOTUS? Is it that Barak Obama does not think that the ACA is worthy of being protected from the destructive intent of the baying Republicons?  That the m

And what of Macron's approach?  Well, it would appear that Macron might be seeing himself as being somewhat of an imperial figure.  Who, if, as is expected, were to become the President of France, is probably likely to attempt to be autocratic in his his rule.  In his endeavour to probably be 21st Century Napoleon, De Gaulle, or Francois Hollande 2.0. Macron is more than likely to steer the SS France in her current Hollandist direction.  He is likely continue with Hollande's France, probably both in national as well as international policies.  Macron appears to be as anti-Russia and anti-Assad as Hollande and his Foreign Ministers have been.  So we can probably expect to see little rapprochement between France and Russia, should Macron wins the Presidency.  Under Macron, France might continue, if not increase her military interventions abroad. Unless he has to change course due to force of circumstances.  For example, if Germany and/or America were to