www.owohrod.com.

However much they might argue that it has not acquired power 'fairly or legitimately or legally?  As has been the 'justification and rationale for supporting opposition forces in countries such as Syria, Libya and Venezuela and other countries?  If we use that as a basis for legitimising 'a people's revolution' and the overthrow of this and that government.   Then why the need for 'the ballot box and free and fair elections', each time after 'a people's revolution' has been assisted to overthrow this and that government?  Is it simply or mostly about 'legitimising' the rule of the new elites? Taken to its logical conclusion, it does not make much sense when seriously analysed.  Within the context of morality, law and legitimacy', the act of 'the people rising up and overthrowing the government - a government which will always or most times have the support of sections of the population - will always be

This is a short video of a pair of tits indulging in an intuitive ritual. Please take a look and have a listen.

They want it all, and they are demanding it, now. Not surprisingly, there are those within the military, and, indeed, the government, who have been stalling, resisting the attempted coup.  Playing for time, hoping that the tide will soon turn in their favour. That they will overcome the confusion, the trepidation that this uprising is evoking in them.   After all, of what use is a military force if it were to so easily and quickly 'give in to the demands' of any force, internal or external, that demand that it does so?  If it were to so so quickly allow itself to be robbed of power, however illegitimately might have been its acquisition? How could such a military be trusted to carry out its duty to protect the people and the nation and country?  Yes, the people might argue that it is the duty of the army, their army, to protect them, but from whom?  Their own government?  And on what basis should the military turn against the government? Is there a

And I acknowledge your pain, and will now bring an end to it. By stopping this famine, this drought, this flood, and this war.'  Never has anything like this ever, or, indeed, probably will ever happen. Why, therefore, should anybody believe that there is a sentient God, when just saying there is and there has to be, is no longer a sufficient and logical reason for believing that there is?  When the fear of your fellow humans torturing and killing people for attesting to the fact of such a God not existing. Is no longer the norm in Christendom? When we hear the clergies of all 'god-based' religions matter-of-factly spouting their meaningless and baselsss platitudes about god this and god that.  And even more despairingly, that other apparently logical humans should be believing what they are saying, and commit their lives to practising it.  Oftentimes to the detriment of them living peacefully and enjoying their lives more than they are doing. 

Of all human endeavours, the 'religion/god industry' is probably our most destructive, because of the degree of its deception, and its repression of our human potential to become more unashamedly masters of our fate!  Instead of wasting our lives with our preoccupation with a non-existent god.  But none of this seems to cause the believers, the Christians, any puzzlement; any public distress or caution.  The absence of tangible and objective evidence of their God, is just something to be overlooked.  Something which is not acknowledged, as their religion and belief in God is all about making assumptions which are beyond proof.  Which defies all observable and scientific evidence to the contrary of what they are professing.  When God fails to act in the direct and compassionate manner in which us humans would expect of a benign God.  We are then told that 'God acts in mysterious - and, is seems, always indirect - ways.' Why, we are even to

This is one of a series of short videos of a couple of urbanite Foxes, and their latest and biggest brood. Do take a look and enjoy what you will of this video and its alluring canned music.

For those ardent advocates of 'western democracy', equating the opportunistic elites who have been attempting to use 'the people.'  To force out the current elite military rulers of Sudan, with a gang holding innocent people as hostages in their demands for whatever they desire, might sound a bit harsh. And yet, I think that there is more validity in drawing such a comparison, than many of the supporters of this 'people's revolution', would want to admit to.  I means, in the proverbial 'nutshell', that is what the elitists 'wannabee leaders' of 'Sudan's people's Revolution' - which is a very questionable description, even though it is one which the Western media and 'western democracy advocates' love to make - are attempting to achieve.  The ad hoc reluctant and not so reluctant leadership of the ad hoc alliance of opposition forces.   Are using 'the people', as represented by t