JUST A THOUGHT - ON HOW THE INTERESTS OF THE MAJORITY ARE SACRIFICED FOR THOSE OF THE MINORITY! PART 2.
Not least, because of the probably inherent duplicity or ambivalence of politics and international affairs. The kind of logic which might caution a country's leaders to to work on two apparently opposing, but probably complementary principles. The one based on the premise that 'the promise of cooperation ' which is being proposed to it, is genuine and will be adhered to by the other side or country. And the other principle being based on the premise that the proposal might not be genuine, and that there might be little or no intention on the part of the other country to carry it out. Actions, as it is said, speaks louder than words, whether the actions are maligned or constructive and positive. So, how did the World get into this position of what Laurel and Hardy might have characterised as 'a fine mess', but one which could have catastrophic implications for an already wilting World? How did the powerful leaders of the leading nations of th