THE LIBERATION OF ALEPPO AND THE DEFEAT OF THE WEST'S TROJAN HORSE!

The liberation of eastern Aleppo by the Syrian Government and its Russian, Iranian and Lebanese coalition has marked a crucial stage in the Syria's war to free itself from the still massive threat of being divided up and re-colonised by the Nato and Muslim countries which have aligned themselves again it

Because of this, the strategic success which has been made in the liberation of eastern Aleppo, which has become the bridge-head of the opposing forces and countries, is not to be underestimated. Indeed, it appears that, based on the level of hand-wringing and deafening lamentations from most of the politicians and media in the west, their loss of eastern Aleppo, their 'fact on the ground', is the equivalent of Britain's debacle at Dunkirk during the Second World War.

 But, for the Syrian people and the revival of hope that this suicidal war will be coming to an end sooner than it otherwise might have been, the liberation - and, yes, effective destruction of much of the infra-structure and residential areas of eastern Aleppo, could be somewhat similar to the victory of the Russians in Stalingrad, in their battle against the Nazi Army.

I am aware that for the supporters of the rebels, the West's and Sunni countries which have created, armed and been supporting the proxy armies of rebels, it is the rebels who they would perceive as being on the side of 'right', and as the equivalent of the unyielding Russian soldiers fighting to protect their lands, their homes, and their country from the invading German Army.

However, it is the Syrian Government and armed forces and their coalition supporters who have been fighting to rid Syria of invading and occupying forces of the Americans, the British, the French, Saudi Arabia and Turkey. Eastern Aleppo was really occupied country, as far as the rest of Syria was concerned.

This is the bigger picture which the Nato countries and the western media has chosen to marginalise and bury. Usually under the astounding emphasis they chose to give to the narrative about the alleged tens of thousands of Syrian civilians being killed and decimated by the Syrian Government and its supporters.

The west, disingenuously and deceitfully, constantly made much of "civilians' dying and being killed, starved, etc - all of which most probably has been happening, considering that a vicious war is being fought by the involved parties - but its commentary speaks loudly by the absence of any objective analysis and contextualisation of what is happening in Aleppo. Such as the fact that, the differentiation between 'civilian' and rebel fighter will not always be a clear cut one, and that at different times, the same person could be a 'civilian' and a rebel fighter.

So, yes, it would be a hardened and bitter and vengeful person who would take any satisfaction in the killing and suffering of any civilians, or the avoidable killing of any of the combatants in this tragic war. At the same time, every reasonable person might be able to find a sense of relief that the liberation of eastern Aleppo should bring the ending of this tragic war closer.  

That being the case, I see no reason for the massive and deafening display of grief and despair by western politicians and their servile media.

The rebels in Eastern Aleppo were being aided and abetted in their occupation of this part of Syria, by foreign governments and armed forces. In any country, that would compromise the sovereignty of that country and constitute a treasonous act. In no way can the defeat of the rebels in eastern Aleppo be seen as anything less than a necessary victory for the Syrian nation and its territorial integrity.

This victory should now advance the cause of national reconciliation and rebuilding of Aleppo. But, of course that will also be a struggle, as the West will doubtlessly put the Syrian people to the sword of 'economic sanctions', to punish their government for having acted in its own best interests.

The west is not arguing that Isis/Daesh should be allowed to continue to occupy Mosul or Raqqa, as that reprehensible entity does not constitute a legitimate 'state.' But then, neither do the proxy rebels who had been occupying eastern Aleppo, albeit on behalf of their Nato and Sunni masters.

As usual, none of this apparent focus on concerns for the welfare of Syrian civilians is the real issue for the west; that is their awareness of the likely strategic geo-political implications of the 'loss of Aleppo' for them. They have lost the 'plot', militarily, diplomatically and strategically, and do not know what to do next.
This is the better outcome.