JAMMU AND KASHMIR - INDIA'S OWN BIG 'GAZA ENCLAVE?' THE END.

-




It should be no surprise that India, a 'democratic' country, is displaying the kind of brutality it is displaying in trying to suppress the dissent of its opponents and ordinary citizens in Jammu and Kashmir. 

Just as how we have become accustomed to Israel's brutality towards the Palestinians in the occupied territories. It is inevitable that the process of maintaining the occupation of a people, will eventually lead to the brutalisation and dehumanisation of both the occupied people and the forces maintaining the occupation.

This apparent self-evident truth, however, does not justify the brutality which seems necessary to maintain the occupation of a people or group of people. Rather, it demonstrates the undesirability of oppressing people, since it can only be achieved through the brutalisation of both the oppressor and the oppressed.

Just as how the State of Israel is required to bring her occupation of the Palestinians to a peaceful and just end, so should the State of India show more courage and prudence in bring the conflict in Jammu and Kashmir to a just and peaceful end. 

Sixty years of conflict is more than enough; what good can come of having another 60 years more? 

You cannot treat people 'as enemies' of the State, and expect them to to identify with being integral members of Indian society; irrespective of their religion, ethnicity and political affiliations. 

India needs to redoubled her efforts to find just and effective means of resolving the very complex situation confronting it in Indian administered Jammu and Kashmir. That does not have to mean giving the territories to Pakistan, on the basis that many of the people share the Islamic faith, as do most of the people of Pakistan. 


The best way to defends ones country is through establishing enduring peace with your people and your neighbours, and not having to squander the country's resources maintaining an oppressive and destructive offensive/defensive regime.

Religious affiliation, in my view, is a poor and backward basis on which to determine the fate of nations.







Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE ISRAEL/PALESTINIAN WAR AND HOW ISRAEL'S LATEST ATROCITY MIGHT HAVE SEALED ITS EVENTUAL DEFEAT! P.4.

-
Image
   It is unlikely that things were ever getting better. But, at least the Palestinians were alive, they had their homes, their roads, water, electricity, the basic requirements for having at least a basic life.  They had more freedom of movement in their 'reservations' than they have now, with the storm troopers crawling over and around them as so many wasps.  So, yes, it is likely that, for the majority of Palestinians who are being forced to pay the price the Zionist Israeli State has decided to extract from them, the attack of 7th October might be considered to have been a tactical mistake by Hamas and the other Resistance Fighters. And yet, it could be the case that the overall and eventual outcome of the attack for the Palestinian people will be a positive one. It has broken the then impasse, the stalemate in progressing the realisation of a sovereign and viable Palestinian State.  It has forced the nations and international organisations, ordinary people of the world to t
Read more

JUST A THOUGHT - ARE PRISONS A SYMBOL OF A PUNITIVE SOCIETY? THE END....

-
Image
By increasing the number of statutes by which citizens can be criminalised. So as to provide a sufficient supply of inmates for the prison population.   As we have seen, for example, in the United States of America. The so-called most advanced country in the world.   But also undoubtedly, probably the most retrograde one, when it comes to the manufacturing of criminal laws, and administration of 'crime and punishment.'  Since, not only does it make having more prisoners as a necessity, in order to keep the private companies holding and processing them, and the 'law enforcement departments, in business.  But it also encourages corruption amongst all those involved in the crime and punishment industry, through the quest to generate income and profits. Objectives which they seek to achieve by brutalising inmates and increasing their prospects for having to pursing a criminal career.  By ensuring that inmates being discharged from the prison industry are l
Read more

THE ISRAEL/PALESTINIAN WAR AND HOW ISRAEL'S LATEST ATROCITY MIGHT HAVE SEALED ITS EVENTUAL DEFEAT! P.1

-
Image
  So, what are my thoughts about Hamas' unprecedented attack on parts of Israel, which has resulted in hundreds of men, women and children, some of them soldiers, being killed and thousands of Israelis becoming shocked and traumatised as they have probably never experienced before? And what are my thoughts about Israel's Zionist government's brutal and merciless counter-attack on, not just Hamas' fighters and military, but on all Palestinians and their social, economic and essential infrastructures in both Gaza and the West Bank? The egg did not come 'out of nowhere', and neither did the chicken. Everything of substance and significance has a context which can help us to define and understand it more than we could or would be able to do, without that context.  This principle also applies to Hamas' attack on Israel, just as how it applies to Israel's subsequent and continuing attack on the Palestinians. And so it is that Hamas' attack on Israel was a
Read more

AMERICA'S DYSFUNCTIONAL DIPLOMATIC MODEL! PART 1.

-
Image
Diplomacy ought to be the process by which nations, through their governments, establish and maintain mutually beneficial and peaceful relationships between them; Diplomacy is not, like the Gulf Cooperation Council members and their allies, including Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain and the UAE states, trying to bully and intimidate Qatar into doing their bidding, by surrendering its sovereignty.  Neither is diplomacy what the American government is doing, in using sanctions to force the governments of states of Iran, Russia and North Korea, into complying with its demands.  About what action they should or should not take in pursuing what they consider to be in the interest of their countries and people.  No, none of this is diplomacy. Rather it is method of force and compulsion, which is not synonymous with principle or practice of diplomacy.  Which is about the art of establishing and maintaining peaceful and mutually beneficial relationships between different countries.
Read more