JUST PHILOSOPHISING - IF MEN WERE TO STOP WOMEN LEADING THE WORLD! PART 6.

Why is, a woman in deep thought, might think, that the concept and practice of 'womanhood', should be predicated on 'man'? 

Why should it she have to be called 'woman', or 'female'? Why should she have to come after the man? 

As if she is an adjunct, and 'essential part of man, perhaps, but not, but not a fully fledged person in her own right. 

Is this all about the Biblical concept, fictitious account of how humans came into existence? 

The crazy story about how god took a rib from Adam and sculpted woman, Eve, out of it?

Hell, if so, then what is this that we hear, often times when there is a Christian burial service,  about 'man that is born of woman'? 

If it is woman who gives birth to man, then how can he be more venerated than said woman? 

But, ok, let us leave the fairy tale account of how humans came into existence, for now.

Even though it appears that it is that same fairy tale which has condemned women to the subservient role to men, which they have become subjected to.

It would be good if there were to be a mass movement, led by women, to redefine themselves and their role in the world. 

To have a new concept of what 'womanhood' is, according to women, and not how man has indoctrinated and socialised women into perceiving of themselves and their role in society. 

That would need to be a project which would require women to change the pronouns by which they are referred to. 

It would not do to call 'woman' woman, women or female, anymore. 

No, it would need to be something which does not places 'man' or 'male' at its epicentre.  

To be continued.