CONTEMPLATING ACHIEVING 'EQUALITY' AND 'FAIRNESS.' THE END..!






It will demand that the goal of  people having a decent standard of living, be placed above the greedy elite minority laying claim to more than a reasonable share of the world's wealth.  

Based on a fair return on their investment of labour and capital. A capital which they most likely will have borrowed, making it at least partly a collective or socialised capital.

But such an arrangement can only take place if us humans can organise our societies on the basis of forming the equivalent of  confederate or federal world government. 

A massive challenge, considering what is happening to multi-national bodies, such as the European Union, the African Union, the Arab League and, of course, the United Nations, which is the precursor of a world or global government. 



Which alludes to the validity of challenging the concept of a global government being a viable one.  

When we consider the existing and increasing economic disparities within not only small countries, but in federate and confederates ones, such as Russia, the United States of America, Australia, et al.

And yet, this stark reality cannot, neither should it be used as a reason for not embarking upon this quest for achieving a higher level of globalisation. 

A kind of empire, if you like, but one which is more socio-economically an politically accountable and responsive to  all citizens.

Of course, us humans will never have complete or total equality in life, as that is only realisable in death. 



We shall have to suffice with increasing and maximising it it, if we are to check and turnaround the appalling situation.  

Where more of the world's wealth is being accumulated in the hands of the top 1 per center, the top 5 per centers, and so on, while less is trickling down to the majority. 

Which could suggest that, we already have a kind of 'global government or oligarchy' exploiting and ruling the world's economies. 

But one which lacks any accountability and collective responsibility for how the accumulated wealth and products are distributed across the globe. 



At least, probably outside of the context of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.

With it being the case that, increasingly, more national states will lack the resources to provide their citizens with a reasonable standard of living.  And that incidence of dire poverty, starvation and conflict will increase.  

It is incumbent on all countries to move towards the principle and organisation of a world government which is more able, willing and has a legal responsibility towards meeting the needs of all people. 

Notwithstanding the fact that some national states, recent examples being the United Kingdom, the Kurdish region of Iraq, Catalonis, and the Trump's America.  

Have, probably misguidedly, been opting for the 'independent, go it alone, 'me-first' approach towards tryig to solve an economic, social and political problem. 

Though what it really needs, is actually the alternative 'collectivism' approach to resolve it.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE ISRAEL/PALESTINIAN WAR AND HOW ISRAEL'S LATEST ATROCITY MIGHT HAVE SEALED ITS EVENTUAL DEFEAT! P.4.

JUST A THOUGHT - ARE PRISONS A SYMBOL OF A PUNITIVE SOCIETY? THE END....

THE ISRAEL/PALESTINIAN WAR AND HOW ISRAEL'S LATEST ATROCITY MIGHT HAVE SEALED ITS EVENTUAL DEFEAT! P.1

THE EMMANUEL CHURCH SERVICE - GODISM, RELIGION AND THE END OF RATIONALITY?