JUST A THOUGHT - ON AMERICAN OCCUPATION OF SYRIA, BEING THE PRICE OF BETRAYAL BY THE 'FAKE' OR 'PSEUDO' 'REVOLUTIONARIES. PART 1.

-





So, according to Rex Tillerson, the top diplomat of the government of the United States of America. President Trump's Administration has decide to occupy a part of Syria, to 'Guantanamoised' it, if you wish.  

 And to use it to effect the overthrow of Syria's legitimate government.  

 Then setup a government which is willing to submits to the authority of the United States of America, and its co-conspirators in this gross act of decadent imperialism. 

 What is the Syria people, what is the world to make of this insane act of the intended rape of Syria's sovereignty by the American Eagle?  By this act of  America declaring de facto war on a sovereign statae?

Probably one of the biggest curse to national sovereignty and independence, of present age or epoch, is that of the harm being done by 'pseudo' or 'populist', or 'fake'  'revolutionaries.' 

 Whereas the traditional or, depending on your particular definition, genuine 'revolutionary' does his/her preparation and become well versed in the ideological framework which they want to impose on society.  

 After they have overthrown the existing social order.  And then set about indoctrination the 'masses' and recruiting the cadres to wage war on the 'oppressors.' 

 Not so for the 'polulist', or 'pusedo', or 'fake revolutionaries.' 

Here, we are not talking about the agent provocateurs which the current incumbents of the State's power  surreptitiously use to get 'the enemies of the State', to show themselves.  

So that other arms of the State can then eliminate them or have them incarcerated.

 No, here we are talking about what you could also call the 'sponsored revolutionary.' Those who are 'sponsored' by foreign governments and bodies, to whom they appeal for help to overthrow the governments of their own countries and install them into power, in their place.

 These are 'revolutionaries' whom we have probably become more acquainted with in the socio-political uprisings and ''Arab Spring revolution.' 

 Of the kind we have seen in places like Georgia, Ukraine, Egypt, Libya, and Syria.

 Yes, it would probably be fair to say the uprising in Ukraine, which was initially peaceful, had some popular legitimacy.  

 As did those in all of the Arab or Middle Eastern countries, which also began peacefully. 

 To be continued!





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE ISRAEL/PALESTINIAN WAR AND HOW ISRAEL'S LATEST ATROCITY MIGHT HAVE SEALED ITS EVENTUAL DEFEAT! P.4.

-
Image
   It is unlikely that things were ever getting better. But, at least the Palestinians were alive, they had their homes, their roads, water, electricity, the basic requirements for having at least a basic life.  They had more freedom of movement in their 'reservations' than they have now, with the storm troopers crawling over and around them as so many wasps.  So, yes, it is likely that, for the majority of Palestinians who are being forced to pay the price the Zionist Israeli State has decided to extract from them, the attack of 7th October might be considered to have been a tactical mistake by Hamas and the other Resistance Fighters. And yet, it could be the case that the overall and eventual outcome of the attack for the Palestinian people will be a positive one. It has broken the then impasse, the stalemate in progressing the realisation of a sovereign and viable Palestinian State.  It has forced the nations and international organisations, ordinary people of the world to t
Read more

JUST A THOUGHT - ARE PRISONS A SYMBOL OF A PUNITIVE SOCIETY? THE END....

-
Image
By increasing the number of statutes by which citizens can be criminalised. So as to provide a sufficient supply of inmates for the prison population.   As we have seen, for example, in the United States of America. The so-called most advanced country in the world.   But also undoubtedly, probably the most retrograde one, when it comes to the manufacturing of criminal laws, and administration of 'crime and punishment.'  Since, not only does it make having more prisoners as a necessity, in order to keep the private companies holding and processing them, and the 'law enforcement departments, in business.  But it also encourages corruption amongst all those involved in the crime and punishment industry, through the quest to generate income and profits. Objectives which they seek to achieve by brutalising inmates and increasing their prospects for having to pursing a criminal career.  By ensuring that inmates being discharged from the prison industry are l
Read more

THE ISRAEL/PALESTINIAN WAR AND HOW ISRAEL'S LATEST ATROCITY MIGHT HAVE SEALED ITS EVENTUAL DEFEAT! P.1

-
Image
  So, what are my thoughts about Hamas' unprecedented attack on parts of Israel, which has resulted in hundreds of men, women and children, some of them soldiers, being killed and thousands of Israelis becoming shocked and traumatised as they have probably never experienced before? And what are my thoughts about Israel's Zionist government's brutal and merciless counter-attack on, not just Hamas' fighters and military, but on all Palestinians and their social, economic and essential infrastructures in both Gaza and the West Bank? The egg did not come 'out of nowhere', and neither did the chicken. Everything of substance and significance has a context which can help us to define and understand it more than we could or would be able to do, without that context.  This principle also applies to Hamas' attack on Israel, just as how it applies to Israel's subsequent and continuing attack on the Palestinians. And so it is that Hamas' attack on Israel was a
Read more

AMERICA'S DYSFUNCTIONAL DIPLOMATIC MODEL! PART 1.

-
Image
Diplomacy ought to be the process by which nations, through their governments, establish and maintain mutually beneficial and peaceful relationships between them; Diplomacy is not, like the Gulf Cooperation Council members and their allies, including Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain and the UAE states, trying to bully and intimidate Qatar into doing their bidding, by surrendering its sovereignty.  Neither is diplomacy what the American government is doing, in using sanctions to force the governments of states of Iran, Russia and North Korea, into complying with its demands.  About what action they should or should not take in pursuing what they consider to be in the interest of their countries and people.  No, none of this is diplomacy. Rather it is method of force and compulsion, which is not synonymous with principle or practice of diplomacy.  Which is about the art of establishing and maintaining peaceful and mutually beneficial relationships between different countries.
Read more