JUST A THOUGHT - ON CARILLIONS BEING ALLOWED TO DIE, AND THE RESPONSIBILITY OF GOVERNMENTS. PART 2.

-






We would not expect our government to ignore the acute plight of a cruise liner floundering and risk sinking in the ocean.  

 On the premise that it is the sole responsibility of the private which owns it, to rescue it, and save the people on it. 

 And, where health care is concerned, we would not expect the government, let us say, of the United Kingdom, to ignore the currently serious plight of their National Health Service. 

 And to be taking a 'hands off approach', and declaring that they have given the NHS enough money already. 

 So it should either rescue itself of sink, and no longer be able to meet the health care and medical needs of the British people.



What we would expect, in both of these cases, is that the government would intervene to work with the owners of the cruise liner, if necessary, and with the NHS, to stabilise and responsibly resolve the problem. 

 If that means injecting a certain amount of 'tax payer's money' into the remedial action. Then, so be it, with, of course, the necessary condition regarding it being repaid later on.  

 After all, the owners of the cruise liner would also be tax-payers, even if the government, in their attempt to appease the populists and appeal to the basest of the political spectrum.  

 Might choose to think of 'tax payers' as only the ordinary 'wage earner.'


At a minimum, what we would not expect, would be for the government to take the 'Pontius Pilate' approach.  

 Of washing their hands of any responsibility for saving the floundering cruise liner, as we have seen the British government doing. 

 In the case of the now apparent death throws of Carillion. Britain's second biggest construction giant. 

 It is unforgivable enough, for the government to fail to carry out its social and economic responsibility.  

 To have taken and take effective steps to safeguard the firm and the jobs and parts of the British economy which rely on the preservation of Carillion for their livelihoods. 

To be continued!







Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE ISRAEL/PALESTINIAN WAR AND HOW ISRAEL'S LATEST ATROCITY MIGHT HAVE SEALED ITS EVENTUAL DEFEAT! P.4.

-
Image
   It is unlikely that things were ever getting better. But, at least the Palestinians were alive, they had their homes, their roads, water, electricity, the basic requirements for having at least a basic life.  They had more freedom of movement in their 'reservations' than they have now, with the storm troopers crawling over and around them as so many wasps.  So, yes, it is likely that, for the majority of Palestinians who are being forced to pay the price the Zionist Israeli State has decided to extract from them, the attack of 7th October might be considered to have been a tactical mistake by Hamas and the other Resistance Fighters. And yet, it could be the case that the overall and eventual outcome of the attack for the Palestinian people will be a positive one. It has broken the then impasse, the stalemate in progressing the realisation of a sovereign and viable Palestinian State.  It has forced the nations and international organisations, ordinary people of the world to t
Read more

JUST A THOUGHT - ARE PRISONS A SYMBOL OF A PUNITIVE SOCIETY? THE END....

-
Image
By increasing the number of statutes by which citizens can be criminalised. So as to provide a sufficient supply of inmates for the prison population.   As we have seen, for example, in the United States of America. The so-called most advanced country in the world.   But also undoubtedly, probably the most retrograde one, when it comes to the manufacturing of criminal laws, and administration of 'crime and punishment.'  Since, not only does it make having more prisoners as a necessity, in order to keep the private companies holding and processing them, and the 'law enforcement departments, in business.  But it also encourages corruption amongst all those involved in the crime and punishment industry, through the quest to generate income and profits. Objectives which they seek to achieve by brutalising inmates and increasing their prospects for having to pursing a criminal career.  By ensuring that inmates being discharged from the prison industry are l
Read more

THE ISRAEL/PALESTINIAN WAR AND HOW ISRAEL'S LATEST ATROCITY MIGHT HAVE SEALED ITS EVENTUAL DEFEAT! P.1

-
Image
  So, what are my thoughts about Hamas' unprecedented attack on parts of Israel, which has resulted in hundreds of men, women and children, some of them soldiers, being killed and thousands of Israelis becoming shocked and traumatised as they have probably never experienced before? And what are my thoughts about Israel's Zionist government's brutal and merciless counter-attack on, not just Hamas' fighters and military, but on all Palestinians and their social, economic and essential infrastructures in both Gaza and the West Bank? The egg did not come 'out of nowhere', and neither did the chicken. Everything of substance and significance has a context which can help us to define and understand it more than we could or would be able to do, without that context.  This principle also applies to Hamas' attack on Israel, just as how it applies to Israel's subsequent and continuing attack on the Palestinians. And so it is that Hamas' attack on Israel was a
Read more

AMERICA'S DYSFUNCTIONAL DIPLOMATIC MODEL! PART 1.

-
Image
Diplomacy ought to be the process by which nations, through their governments, establish and maintain mutually beneficial and peaceful relationships between them; Diplomacy is not, like the Gulf Cooperation Council members and their allies, including Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain and the UAE states, trying to bully and intimidate Qatar into doing their bidding, by surrendering its sovereignty.  Neither is diplomacy what the American government is doing, in using sanctions to force the governments of states of Iran, Russia and North Korea, into complying with its demands.  About what action they should or should not take in pursuing what they consider to be in the interest of their countries and people.  No, none of this is diplomacy. Rather it is method of force and compulsion, which is not synonymous with principle or practice of diplomacy.  Which is about the art of establishing and maintaining peaceful and mutually beneficial relationships between different countries.
Read more