JUST A THOUGHT - ON THE EXPEDIENT EXPENDABILITY OF THE SPONSORED ARMIES PART 2.

It is difficult for a logical person to accept such reports of chemical agents being used, without being provided with conclusive proof. 

Especially when we apply the fake 'Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction Proof' criteria. 

The Syrian government would be being unforgivably reckless and suicidal to be using chemical agents. 

It would be more advantageous and make more sense, if it were the rebels and/or their supporters, who are responsible for 'manufacturing' the 'attack.'

Of course, national armies and armed groups and militias do not always do what is right or what is or might be expected of them. They do not always to what might be considered the logical thing to do. 

Consider what is happening in the Syrian district of Afrin, between the Russians, the Turks and the Kurdish YPG. 

And, yes, the Syrian government, which according to a report, is preventing civilians fleeing the carnage in Afrin from fleeing to government control areas to find safety. 

Why would the Syrian government, a government which loudly declares that it is fighting the nation's unification and sovereignty, deny safety to its citizens? 

We can understand it taking steps to prevent rebels using the opportunity of the Afrin battle to move back to Aleppo and other areas to try to retrench themselves and attack the government's forces.  

But to simply close the door on everybody is not what we would expect of  a reputable government, which is fighting for its citizens.

And much the same applies to the Russian response to the Turkish government, asking it to stand down its forces in Afrin and other areas.  

And  to allow the Turkish army to move into Afrin to obliterate the YPG and Afrin's infrastructure. 

The very force with which the Russians forces in Syria, along with the Syrian government forces and its allies, have been fighting ISIL. 

To be continued!