JUST A THOUGHT - ON IRAN'S RIGHT TO ACT TO SECURE ITS CITIZENS' WELFARE FROM AMERICAN ATTACKS.. THE END, FOR NOW!

Depriving them of the means - freedom to trade with other countries, without the threat of primary or secondary American sanctions - with which to have and enjoy the essential freedoms of all benevolent states.

The Iranian government is therefore right and justified in declaring its intention to disrupt, where it can, trading activities of nations around it. 

Which, in the first instance, is likely to target the perfidious Saudis and it UAE allies. 

If Saudi Arabia and its allies are going to cosy themselves up with the Americans, in doing massive harm to Iran and her people. 

Then, it is only logical that they should be made to pay a disproportionate and massive price for their treachery. 

I nation should never make war when their are other acceptable alternative means open to it, to secure its just and reasonable interests. 

It would seem that Iran has no such alternative means open to it; at least, it is getting near to that point.

For Iran and her people, they are fighting for their survival, for the health and development of their nation. 

This struggle, for them, is really about their 'pursuit of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.' 

It is about their struggle against an enemy, the government of the United States of America, which seeks to destroy them as a viable nation, and to enslave them. 

America has never been the 'freedom-loving', 'democratic' country it has made itself out to be, and, even more stupendously, indoctrinated millions of people to come to believe. 

Like the concept of the existence of god, the myth has taken the form of 'reality', even in the voidness of any tangible evidence for what the country is claiming to be its core values. 

Like those who see themselves as the disciples of 'the only true religion', America  seeks to indoctrinate and dominate all peoples and nations, at whatever cost to them. The people and nation it targets. 

This is not right, and it should it be allowed to succeed, even though the cost of opposing it, could prove grievous, though not necessarily more costly than that of simply succumbing or capitulating.