JUST PHILOSOPHISING - ON THE IMPERMANENCE OF LIFE AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE. PART 3.










But how can such a thing be achieved, especially when it is given to us humans to live no more than, normally, more than a hundred years? 

Surely, living a hundred years, even two or three hundreds year, when compared to the infinity of time, is far from 'living for ever', or attaining 'everlasting life.' 

Even if anybody would be so foolish as to desire such cursed and lonely state of being.




So, no. It would not be prudent or feasible for the impermanent state of being of us humans, to be replaced by one of a self-perceiving state of permanence.

The best way for us to deal our state of impermanence, is to accept it. 

To adjust our intellect into accepting the logic and compassion of us humans not having to become loss in time and space.  




Not having to witness and endure, forever, the pain of the brutality and tragedy of a life which goes on, and on, and on, and on......

Our logical response to our impermanent state of being, is to accept our humanity and do all that we can, without deliberately harming others, to enjoy our experiences of living. 

Of living like mortal humans, and not wishing or endeavouring to emulate, to be jealous or envious of the non-existent gods.  

To be continued!






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE ISRAEL/PALESTINIAN WAR AND HOW ISRAEL'S LATEST ATROCITY MIGHT HAVE SEALED ITS EVENTUAL DEFEAT! P.4.

JUST A THOUGHT - ARE PRISONS A SYMBOL OF A PUNITIVE SOCIETY? THE END....

THE ISRAEL/PALESTINIAN WAR AND HOW ISRAEL'S LATEST ATROCITY MIGHT HAVE SEALED ITS EVENTUAL DEFEAT! P.1

THE EMMANUEL CHURCH SERVICE - GODISM, RELIGION AND THE END OF RATIONALITY?