BRITAIN'S BREXIT TRAGEDY - PRIME MINISTER THERESA MAY MORE EMPEROR NERO THAN BOUDICA !!PART 5.

In a world which has now become more collectivised, smaller, and needs to reinforce the collectivist approach to sustaining humanity, in a more, and not less habitable and peaceful environment.

It is the duty and responsibility of good leaders to have a vision of what is right and what is wrong. 

Of what are desirable, achievable and 'cost effective', in the broad terms, goals for the people, and to ensure that these reflect, as much as possible, and resonate with the people. 

With the greatest majority of the people and not just over half of them. 

To walk away from the European Union, because 'we want to be in charge of our own borders, to be have more control in keeping outsiders out. 

To be able apply our own regulations to our fishing and agricultural industries.  And remove the jurisdiction of the European Court, etc. 

Is to behave like a petulant child who throws away the ball or kicks overs the wickets, etc, and declares him/herself not to be 'playing anymore.' 

Because 'he is not winning', or that 'the others are cheating.' Surely, such a stance is unbecoming of a country and nation, which was a former imperial power ruling most of the then known world, and doing so by its own rules? Is it not?

Yes, it is the case that, if you are somebody who pay homage to the the concept and practice of 'simple or basic democracy.'  

The idea that the preference of 'the majority', however small it happens to be, should be the decisive factor in determining whether Britain should or should not walk away from the European Union. 

To be continued!