JUST A THOUGHT - ON, IS PAKISTAN BEING RULED BY 'ISLAMISISED MOBOCRACY'? PART 7.

Namely this: If they wish to follow the ways of Prophet Muhammad, before he came to perceive of himself and be acknowledged as a Messenger of Allah? 

Before he became or was sanctified. By man, it must be said, as has been done in the case of the declared Saints of all religions.  

Then, are they not following the ways of 'a man', who, at that point in his life, was just like any other 'man or human', apart from his clan status? 

And, if that is the Muhammad, the Muhammad who, at that time or point of his ascension,  would have 'thought and behaved as men of his time did?' 

Then, is it not the case that, questioning the authority of that 'pre-prophet' and pre-sanctified' Muhammad, should not be considered as as a 'blasphemous' act?  

Whereas, if we 'work with the concept and/or practice of Prophet Muhammad, after the time he and/or others, his followers, for example, had declared that he is 'a Messenger of Allah.' 

And his followers, as has been the the way of many religions, 'sanctified' and made him into a prophet. 

Then, questioning the divinity of the authority which his followers have attributed to him. 

And doing so in much the same manner as how rational humans question and analyse the reputed religious and divine authority of any other humans who declare themselves or have been declared as 'Prophets of God.'  

To be continued!