JUST A THOUGHT - ON BREXIT AND BUST, IN THE QUEST FOR THE ELUSIVE UTOPIAN NATIONALISM. THE END..?

-







And, by appropriately drafted, I mean a referendum which sets and spells out the required proportion of the eligible electorate that need to vote. 

And the margin by which the 'motion' must be carried or defeated. 

It should also include more than a yes or no motion, not restricting the nation to a 'leave' or 'remain' choice.

I am aware that there are those who argue that, the British 'democracy system' is one which requires a simple majority, to determine the outcome of an election, or, for that matter, a referendum. 


While this is currently the case, it is also clear that this system is too simplistic and outdated to meet the more nuances and divergent and mature demands of the contemporary political thinking of the electorate. 

The First Past the Post electoral system which Britain indulges in, is the equivalent of an illiterate person signing his/her name by marking the spot with an X. 

The only problem is that the British electorate is not illiterate. Neither are they the unsophisticated children which their anachronistic electoral system is treating them as. 


A system which has a lot to answer for, in having taken the British people to the terrible crisis they are currently experiencing with Brexit.

Which is why, if there is to be another referendum concerning Britain's role in the European Union, great care should be given to how it is drafted. 

 Stipulating the need for a specifically high percentage of the eligible electorate to have to vote.  

 And for, in my opinion, a two-thirds or higher percentage of the voters, to have voted for the United Kingdom to leave the European Union, before it could continue to proceed in doing so.


Will the British political and governmental system allow the British people the opportunity and tools to help to resolve the self-inflicted tragedy they are now in? 

 Or will the political elites simply continue to try to manipulate the defective and outdated political system, in order to maintain or achieve party political power?

 By the end of today, December 12, 2018, when the latest instalment of this very British fiasco is played out in the British Parliament, we should, hopefully, have the answer. 

 However illogical and incredible it might be or appear to be.





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE ISRAEL/PALESTINIAN WAR AND HOW ISRAEL'S LATEST ATROCITY MIGHT HAVE SEALED ITS EVENTUAL DEFEAT! P.4.

-
Image
   It is unlikely that things were ever getting better. But, at least the Palestinians were alive, they had their homes, their roads, water, electricity, the basic requirements for having at least a basic life.  They had more freedom of movement in their 'reservations' than they have now, with the storm troopers crawling over and around them as so many wasps.  So, yes, it is likely that, for the majority of Palestinians who are being forced to pay the price the Zionist Israeli State has decided to extract from them, the attack of 7th October might be considered to have been a tactical mistake by Hamas and the other Resistance Fighters. And yet, it could be the case that the overall and eventual outcome of the attack for the Palestinian people will be a positive one. It has broken the then impasse, the stalemate in progressing the realisation of a sovereign and viable Palestinian State.  It has forced the nations and international organisations, ordinary people of the world to t
Read more

JUST A THOUGHT - ARE PRISONS A SYMBOL OF A PUNITIVE SOCIETY? THE END....

-
Image
By increasing the number of statutes by which citizens can be criminalised. So as to provide a sufficient supply of inmates for the prison population.   As we have seen, for example, in the United States of America. The so-called most advanced country in the world.   But also undoubtedly, probably the most retrograde one, when it comes to the manufacturing of criminal laws, and administration of 'crime and punishment.'  Since, not only does it make having more prisoners as a necessity, in order to keep the private companies holding and processing them, and the 'law enforcement departments, in business.  But it also encourages corruption amongst all those involved in the crime and punishment industry, through the quest to generate income and profits. Objectives which they seek to achieve by brutalising inmates and increasing their prospects for having to pursing a criminal career.  By ensuring that inmates being discharged from the prison industry are l
Read more

THE ISRAEL/PALESTINIAN WAR AND HOW ISRAEL'S LATEST ATROCITY MIGHT HAVE SEALED ITS EVENTUAL DEFEAT! P.1

-
Image
  So, what are my thoughts about Hamas' unprecedented attack on parts of Israel, which has resulted in hundreds of men, women and children, some of them soldiers, being killed and thousands of Israelis becoming shocked and traumatised as they have probably never experienced before? And what are my thoughts about Israel's Zionist government's brutal and merciless counter-attack on, not just Hamas' fighters and military, but on all Palestinians and their social, economic and essential infrastructures in both Gaza and the West Bank? The egg did not come 'out of nowhere', and neither did the chicken. Everything of substance and significance has a context which can help us to define and understand it more than we could or would be able to do, without that context.  This principle also applies to Hamas' attack on Israel, just as how it applies to Israel's subsequent and continuing attack on the Palestinians. And so it is that Hamas' attack on Israel was a
Read more

AMERICA'S DYSFUNCTIONAL DIPLOMATIC MODEL! PART 1.

-
Image
Diplomacy ought to be the process by which nations, through their governments, establish and maintain mutually beneficial and peaceful relationships between them; Diplomacy is not, like the Gulf Cooperation Council members and their allies, including Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain and the UAE states, trying to bully and intimidate Qatar into doing their bidding, by surrendering its sovereignty.  Neither is diplomacy what the American government is doing, in using sanctions to force the governments of states of Iran, Russia and North Korea, into complying with its demands.  About what action they should or should not take in pursuing what they consider to be in the interest of their countries and people.  No, none of this is diplomacy. Rather it is method of force and compulsion, which is not synonymous with principle or practice of diplomacy.  Which is about the art of establishing and maintaining peaceful and mutually beneficial relationships between different countries.
Read more