BIRTH OF CHRIST AND THE TRIAL OF JEHOVAH, CHRISTIANITY'S GOD. PART 10.









If it was 'consensual', it would have meant, in stark terms, that Mary Magdalene and 'The Holy Ghost', God.  

Had discussed and agreed, of their own 'free will', to have sexual relations, for the specific purpose of giving birth to a child who would be called, Jesus Christ.

And that they had both done so, knowing that she, Mary, was already betrothed, if not already married to Joseph. 

They would have known that such a thing was against the Ten Commandments which God himself had reputedly given to Moses while hie was in the desert. 




Thou shall not lust after thy neighbour's wife; thou shall not commit adultery. 

There is, therefore, no doubt that, on the basis of what was expected and normative behaviour between men and women. 

What is alleged to have occurred between God and Mary was wrong. 

t would have bee against the laws, first, the traditional and customary laws, and, secondly, against the religious laws. 

It would have been a sin for Mary to have had sex with God and vice versa.  

To be continued!







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

JUST A THOUGHT - ARE PRISONS A SYMBOL OF A PUNITIVE SOCIETY? THE END....

THE ISRAEL/PALESTINIAN WAR AND HOW ISRAEL'S LATEST ATROCITY MIGHT HAVE SEALED ITS EVENTUAL DEFEAT! P.4.

THE ISRAEL/PALESTINIAN WAR AND HOW ISRAEL'S LATEST ATROCITY MIGHT HAVE SEALED ITS EVENTUAL DEFEAT! P.1

THE EMMANUEL CHURCH SERVICE - GODISM, RELIGION AND THE END OF RATIONALITY?