SUDAN'S FAILED COUP - THE HIGH RISK OF WANTING IT ALL, NOW!

No; none of them have become such models. Because it is easier and quicker to destroy than to build something better. 

Which is why 'revolution and/or rebellion' is such a terrible method of trying to build a better country.

Sudan needs a strong and prudent leader to pull it back from the brink, to reestablish security and stability over the country. 

So begin to create and strengthen the necessary conditions for it to make progress towards better governance. 

This cannot be achieved by the opposition forces holding 'a gun at the head of the nation, and giving the government an ultimatum.'

It does not have the moral and/or legal and political legitimacy to do so. 

The opposition should engage in a process, a gradual process of working with the existing structures to help to bring about the conditions for the gradual, but relentless improvement of Sudan and its people. 

As the saying goes, 'Rome was not built in a day', in fact, neither was the 'world', according to the creationists who believe there is a sentient 'God', 'created' in a day. 

And neither will the 'new Sudan' to which the opposition forces aspire, be prepared and built in a year, or 5 years or even 10 years. 

For those who have allowed their aspirations to wrongly lead them by their enthusiasm and euphoria.  

Let them look to the history of Sudan, and, even more recently, to the post-independence history of South Sudan. 

The is no tenable and sustainable 'quick fix' solution to healing and improving the conditions of Sudan. Or to any other country.

After the morning or spring of 'the revolution', comes the its night and winter, which is always its real test, as the waters abated and its cost can be more accurately evaluated.