JUST A THOUGHT ON - CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE DEMISE OF EARTH'S INHABITANTS. PART 4.










Instead of seeing them as 'our natural resources which are ours to exploit as necessary and as we want to.' 

Instead of each country, especially the lesser developed ones, saying to themselves and other, we cannot do what is necessary, or what the more developed countries are asking of us.  

Until we have achieved a standard of living similar or better than yours, or some other baseline we have set for ourselves. 

A not unreasonable position, even if, by the time that goal is achieved, more irreparable damage will have been done to the planet.




And what of the other option; that of the more developed countries paying a 'climate-subsidy or premium' to some of all of the lesser developed countries.  

In lieu of them maintaining X amount of their forests, their mineral deposits and/or seashore intact?


Well, that would make good sense, which is probably one of the reasons why it will or would be difficult to achieve and police. 


The local elites see 'their countries natural resources as theirs to exploit, often through corrupt means, and will oftentimes be loathe give or share control over these resources with outside bodies. 

To be continued!






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

JUST A THOUGHT - ARE PRISONS A SYMBOL OF A PUNITIVE SOCIETY? THE END....

THE ISRAEL/PALESTINIAN WAR AND HOW ISRAEL'S LATEST ATROCITY MIGHT HAVE SEALED ITS EVENTUAL DEFEAT! P.4.

THE ISRAEL/PALESTINIAN WAR AND HOW ISRAEL'S LATEST ATROCITY MIGHT HAVE SEALED ITS EVENTUAL DEFEAT! P.1

THE EMMANUEL CHURCH SERVICE - GODISM, RELIGION AND THE END OF RATIONALITY?