JUST PHILOSOPHISING - ON WHICH 'FREEDOMS' ARE OF GREATER IMPORTANCE. PART 3.

 







And so must a decision be made as to which merit and/or should be given priority, when those seeking them are in competition with one another?

Now, of course many or most of us would like to be able to exercise as many of our 'rights' as possible. Having our cakes and being able to eat them, as it were. 

And that should be understandable, as it is a human condition. 

After all, why have a cake at all, if we are only able to look at it, analyse it and not be able to eat it?




That, however, is not going to happen; we cannot have all our rights being satisfied at the same time. 

Neither can we all exercise them at the same time, when they would conflict with other people's rights.

This is why we must prioritise what is more or most important to us, and prioritise and compromise on them. 

I do not think that any of our 'rights' are absolute or sacred.

Let us, for example, take the 'right' of the individual or people to be able to exercise their rights to practice their religion.

To be continued!







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE ISRAEL/PALESTINIAN WAR AND HOW ISRAEL'S LATEST ATROCITY MIGHT HAVE SEALED ITS EVENTUAL DEFEAT! P.4.

JUST A THOUGHT - ARE PRISONS A SYMBOL OF A PUNITIVE SOCIETY? THE END....

THE ISRAEL/PALESTINIAN WAR AND HOW ISRAEL'S LATEST ATROCITY MIGHT HAVE SEALED ITS EVENTUAL DEFEAT! P.1

THE EMMANUEL CHURCH SERVICE - GODISM, RELIGION AND THE END OF RATIONALITY?