JUST A THOUGHT ON - 'SURVIVING SOCIAL WORK. PART 9.

 

Whether the vulnerable child's mother's volatile partner might not have been upstairs hiding under the bed.  

And how they, the lone worker, had not felt empowered to ask, to demand, even, that the mother allowed the worker to have a look around the house. 

Or of how, not having another pair of eyes, ears and different mind-set. 

Had failed one tired and jaded worker from picking up on a vital clue which would or could have a significant bearing on how effectively the child is safeguarded.

I would also argue that more use should be made of smartphones and strategically sited security cameras in the homes of children who are at high risk of harm.  

But who are still living with the parents and/or carers who are considered to pose that risk to their children. 

Yes, it is the case that the human rights of both the child and the parents and family have to be considered, weighted and taken account of in the assessment and planning of the safeguarding plan for the child. 

Nevertheless, where it is considered that the level of danger poses to the child deemed to be at risk child, outweighs the consideration of the human rights of the parents.  

Many people would argue that priority should be given to safeguarding the child. The paramount consideration should be given to safeguarding the child's safety and welfare. 

To be continued!