JUST PHILOSOPHISING ON - HOW VIOLENT REVOLUTION IS NOW INCAPABLE OF BEING A MEANS OF BETTERMENT! PART 5.

  

Yes, there are many people who 'love a revolution.'  They include the opportunistic jobless,  the aspiring and the idealistic young person. 

The opportunistic business person, the global arms industry, the people who are hoping to move in and make loads of money 'rebuilding what has been destroyed. 

The political protagonists and the media and media moguls and, yes political idealists. 

But most of them/us, are more than satisfied with 'other people' fighting and dying in the revolution. 

All or most of us would not want to be in the thick of such seemingly pointless and illogical destruction of lives, livelihoods and natural and manufactured resources. 

After all, where is the evidence that violent revolutions increases, instead of reduces a nation's wealth? If there is any, I am not aware of it. 

This is probably not surprising, as it is a nation's productive processes and its applied intellectual properties which and governance which can increase or decrease its development and wealth.  

Rather than any seminal act of 'violent revolutionary fervour or spasm.' 

Yes, I can understand and appreciate how it has, can, and most probably will continue to be the case that a section, be it large or small, of a nation place their faith in the exercise of 'violent revolution' as the most likely means by which to improve their and others lot. 

In a society in which injustice is or seems to be profound and endemic. 

I can appreciate how the oppressed, 'the wretched of the Earth', the havesnot and the havetoolittle, beit food to earth, decent accommodation, poor and toxic environment, or 'freedom' and 'liberty'. 

Might seize on the option of attempting to destroy or drive into sea, the haves and the havestoomuch, but it simply does not work out in the way 'the revolutionaries' expect and promise that it will.  

To be continued!