LIBYAN 'SLAVE TRADING' - A TRAGIC DISTRACTION FROM THE NEED FOR EUROPE AND AMERICA TO REBUILD THE COUNTRY THEY DESTROYED'? PART 2.

The flame which is still consuming Libya's neighbours, as well as parts of the Middle East. The flames which France's Emmanuel Macron, in his frequent visits to Francophone Africa, is 'not', but is 'lecturing' African governments to put out.  

Are the same flames which France and her Nato allies have set in Libya. 

Europe and Nato, then, are the equivalent of 'arsonists' in Africa and the Middle East;  recklessly setting fires and then leaving the 'natives', whose resources are already depleted, to put them out, or be consumed by them.

Let us look at some of the impact of this catastrophic European and Nato fire-setting. 

Mali and her Sahel partners, Chad and Niger, have been destabilised. Their and their neighbours' economies have been seriously harmed by the decapitation of Libya. 

The removal of Libya as a source of employment for tens of thousands of Africans.  

Have meant increased unemployment, poverty and probably more political instability in the countries that had been sending their young men and women to work in Libya.

And then, of course, there is the terrible cost in lives and livelihoods.  Which the continuing bloody conflict in Libya is extracting from both its citizens and the hapless migrants. 

Who, in their desperation and yearning for a better life, willingly and unwillingly allow themselves to be secreted through her borders, and into the hell which Libya has become.

For example, we should never forget the slaughtering of the dozens of Egyptian migrant workers by Islamic State terrorists.  

Who have exploited the vacuum created in Libya, following the overthrow of the legitimate government of that country.

But that might not be of any immediate concern for the European, American and Arab conspirators.  Who are responsible for he misery which their destructive action have caused to Libya and her people.  

Now in the comparatively much safer environment of their own countries. 

After all, is the greatest effect of 'the problem' not being felt in Africa and the Middle East, by the Africans and the Arabs? 

Then, they might argue, if must be a 'problem for the Africans and the Arabs.' It is their responsibility of their leaders to resolve it. 

Since we have now done our bit, as the wrecking crew, having acted upon the pretext we have manufactured to 'get the invitation' to go into, in this case, Libya, to smash a country we considered to be our strategic enemy. 

Too bad if we have sort of 'hydraised' the enemy, with various parts of 'the problem' popping up in many places, including our European and American home. 

That we will have to resolve, even if, again, we will insist on the Africans, the Muslims, the poor, paying most of the cost. 

It is 'the price they should expect to pay for admission to 'Club Western 'Democracy.'

To be continued.