JUST PHILOSOPHISING ON : SUPPOSE THEIR IS REALLY LIFE AFTER DEATH? PART 3.

  

Or, in the case of the 'Re-incarnationsists', that 'the hosted spirit' jumps from its host's body, our bodies, at the point of death, and then conveniently finds and occupies the body of a 'soulless' or 'spiritless' newly born human or animal.  

Is, in plain and unambiguous language, bunkers; it is not true because it is not logical or feasible.

It is something which is truly only tenable in the land of fairy tales. It is the adult's equivalent of a child's ability to imagine that he/she can fly of their own accord. 

For all we know, through observations and science, there is no evidence that it is probable, or even possible, that the "me" and the "I" in our ergosumness, 'I think therefore I am and exists", can be generated and/or exists outside of "our bodies." 

"Me" or "I" is not an existentialistic consciousness which floats or is capable of moving about like a cloud or cosmic dust. 

"We" or "We-ness" is the product of our physiological bodies and what we have observed and what we have, through our sensory perceptions, made of the world. 

Without our bodies, "we" do not exist because we are, as it were, groundless, centreless. 

When we speak of 'our', we are identifying our ownership over something, for example, 'our bodies' 'our intellect', which we are saying is 'subject to our control or direction', unless a part or parts of it is suffering from paralysis.

The centrality of our bodies to our-being, our existence, can be seen even in the paradoxical account of the myth of Christ's death and resurrection. 

In that the religious clergies and deceivers who created and developed the stories of 'man communicating with 'god' and vice versa need to make god personified into human form. 

Because, next to the ascribed prophets telling speaking to us purportedly on behalf of 'god.' 

To be continued!